Blog on Bartholomae: 10/27/2014

In Bartholomae’s “Inventing the University”, found at http://wac.colostate.edu/jbw/v5n1/bartholomae.pdf, Bartholomae discusses the writing of college students. Bartholomae argues that most college level students are “basic writers”, and that a student must learn to be an “insider”, one who understands what type of writing is expected of them at the university level and is able to mimic the style in their own writing.

Bartholomae’s article is intended for an audience of teachers. He is saying that the students must learn to basically please their teachers by writing as they do and with the same language and style.

With my future field being accounting, I am going to have to learn many advanced terms that most of my clients will not understand. Most accountants are perceived as manipulators because of this. I believe that a better way to communicate with the client would be to help them fully understand everything I tell them and to explain it on terms that they would actually understand. The relationship with my clients would then become greater because they would feel that they could trust me. Customer relations is important in almost all fields. However, I must also know the advanced terms as an accountant. I will need them when consulting with my colleagues, or in meetings with my supervisors and other higher officials in my firm. If I were to speak to them with simpler terms I would not be taken as seriously, and may be perceived as not as intelligent. Since they, too, would know the same accounting terms, it would be best to use them when talking with other accountants to create a more educated sort of atmosphere. I believe that a good accountant would be able to properly communicate with those who are and those who are not familiar with the terms in my field.

I am setting goals, as you might say, for what I need to do in the next four years in order to become the best me I can be in my field. Having read Bartholomae’s article, I feel like I better understand the message he addressed. In order to be successful I am going to have to understand what is expected of me and how to recreate the expectations in my own work. I would personally argue that this could be the key to school. The quicker you learn to give them what they want, the faster you will succeed. You must learn to be an insider and be able to speak the language and style that your teachers expect from you.

Growing up I was taught that there was one way to write an essay and one way only. It was MLA format. Specific points had to go in specific spots, thing had to sound a certain way, and certain language had to be used. While I agree with teaching that way, I do not agree that it should be the only thing that was embedded into my young mind. Once I got to college, I learned that there are many ways to do the same thing. Each professor is going to be different and expect different things. It is not as important to learn to write the way an English teacher writes, for that will not help me be a more successful accountant. I need to learn what accountants do. How they write and how I can become better at that. I need to learn about my future and how I can succeed after I walk across the stage in four years; not how I can succeed in writing as an English teacher.

This whole aspect of school was not even brought to my attention until I took Professor Griffiths ENG 121 class. I never realized that students would each need to write in different ways, and she wants us to write that way versus all of us writing in the same unhelpful way.

Advertisements

My Writing Process 10/19/2014

20141019_103052

My latest writing piece was an essay about the type of writing that I will find in my future field of accounting.  Even further into the matter, I was prompted with a follow up to describe and illustrate the way in which I wrote my essay. In “Chronotopic Lamination: Tracing the Contours of Literate Activity” by Paul Prior and Jody Shipka, the idea of the writing process is greatly explored. “The first picture should represent how you actually engaged in writing this particular piece. That picture might show a place or places where you wrote, a kind of sustained episode of writing, what resources you use, other people whoa re involved, how you vary your activities as you engage in a  specific episode of writing, how you feel during the writing” p(182). In response, I drew my illustration, as show above, to the proposed directions.

First, I attempted to find articles about a topic of debate within my future field. After looking in the wrong places, my professor helped me learn where exactly to look. I then browsed through many articles before I found two on the same topic that I believed I could write an amazing essay on. They were both about fair value accounting. I then had the basis for my essay, and I read and reread and reread my articles and highlighted important pieces which I thought would be beneficiary.

20141019_103036

“The second picture should represent the whole writing process for this project from start to finish (or to the current stage). The picture might show how this writing project got started, interactions with other people and other texts, experiences that have shaped the project over time, the history of drafts and responses to the drafts, your evaluations of and emotions about this project at different times and so forth” p(182). Once I knew the topic that I was going to write about, it was time to get started.

Sitting down with a classmate, we discussed what we each thought the professor had wanted from us, and we quickly realized that we had no idea. After emailing the professor we had a general idea and were both able to start writing. Being able to brainstorm with a classmate helped each of us view each other’s points and ideas. I believe that this greatly aided each of our writing pieces. After procrastinating on writing my first draft, it was the night before it was due. Typical college student right there. Anyways, I bribed myself by saying that as soon as I was done, I could go eat. Hungry, I was motivated to actually write my paper. I wrote a general sentence for each of the following; opening sentence, thesis, each body paragraph assertion, each general idea within those body paragraphs, closing summary sentences for each, a restated thesis, and a closing line. Satisfied with myself, I called it a wrap and went to dinner. The next day, before class, I read over my outline to ensure that it flowed correctly. We had a peer revision day where I was able to see other papers, and to get feedback from my peers on my work. I then felt that I understood the assignment more and was ready to add onto my paper.

Between sleeping, watching tv, eating, other homework, and other such activities, I slowly worked upon my second draft a little at a time. I expanded on each sentence I had previously had, and I also changed a few ideas. By the end of the night I was done, and I had the entire next day not to worry about my paper. After the next peer revision day in class, my paper had seen dramatic changes in comparison to the first draft. I did not touch my essay the day after those peer revisions. I gave myself time to be away from my paper and to think about it. In the next couple of days I slowly worked on transforming my paper into my final draft. I added more detail to some ideas, had my roommates read my paper, and read the paper aloud to myself. Of course, these actions were sporadic between meals, sleep, showers, other homework, classes, and other such activities, for that is how I work best. At the end, I turned my paper in early and then let it slip out of my thoughts. It was finally over and I was pleased with my work. This was my writing process.

Blog 10/1/14: EMU Faculty in Accounting

At http://www.emich.edu/cob/faculty/accounting_finance/ a list of faculty that are involved in accounting here at Eastern Michigan University is readily available.

While the faculty teach accounting classes downtown at the College of Business, many, if not most, do work beyond the classroom. Many post in business journals as well as accounting journals. Some have their own entries, while others collaborate with other authors to develop an entry. I would assume that all of the accounting faculty do research that relates to accounting. While some may have pieces in books and papers.

Linda J. Burilovich, for example, has had frequent work in “The Tax Advisor” volumes.

http://www.emich.edu/cob/faculty/accounting_finance/burilovich.php

The work of these professors relates to the article I have been working with. The article I have been working with focus on fair value accounting. The faculty here at EMU show me that there are many topics in my field that are always being discussed. The topics are not limited to fair value accounting. There will always be new trends, ideas, and research in my field.

In my field of accounting, my largest current question would be what does the future of accounting practices look like? What processes are not working currently? What needs to be fixed? What ideas are being figured out in today’s accounting world?

With these questions in mind, my interest in accounting grows greatly. What can I make of myself in the field? What can I do to help accounting grow and prosper?

I know I have a long ways to go in my education, but I am excited to one day be in a firm helping others and becoming a better accountant each and every day, just as the faculty here at EMU does daily.

Blog 9/28/14: About Why “Fair Value” Is the Rule

“Why “Fair Value” Is the Rule” is an article written by Karthik Ramanna. Ramanna states that fair value accounting is on the ascent.

http://hbr.org/2013/03/why-fair-value-is-the-rule/ar/1

The article’s main audience appears to be the general public. The article is not written with extremely difficult terms, nor is it intended for small children. I would argue that this article is at a medium level of difficulty.

The article is a public accounting academic article. It is not specifically for accountants, and it is informational. The article provides well thought out points that could be useful to a variety of persons. Students, accountants, highly curious people, and others who are researching the idea of fair value accounting could find this article to be of use.

In a different genre I would expect this article to be vastly different. If this article were intended for fiction, or comic, or children, I would expect a more entertaining aspect to it. However, for the genre that this article is classified in, I believe the aspects are accurately stated.

Ramanna addresses the counterargument , “the accounting basis-whether fair value or historical cost-affects investment choices and management decisions” in the third paragraph of the article. He then adds that fair value accounting is the supposable blame for “dubious practices” in the leading up to the famous Wall street crash. Ramanna then states that some have connected failures with bankers and managers versus fair value accounting. Finally, he concludes the argument by stating that fair value accounting was not the root of the problem, but instead a catalyst.

I, personally, found the article to be very informational as well as well thought out. The setup for the organization was well thought out, and it flowed smoothly. I would highly recommend that anyone read Ramanna’s article.

Blog #2: Crushman

In Ellen Cushman’s article, Opinion: The Public Intellectual, a public intellectual is claimed to be an educated member of society that tends to rank higher in the “social ladder”. However, Cushman argues that not all public intellectuals are of the middle and upper class.

One merit of public intellectualism is service learning. Service learning is community service that reemphasizes a learning goal from the classroom, or any other form of volunteer work that teaches one something.

Complications of the phrase “public intellectualism” include a degrading of the lower social classes. The lower social classes are deemed to be unintelligent and not part of the community intellectuals. This is not true. I believe that all members of a society each contribute to the overall intelligence within the community. The problem with the term “public intellectuals” is that it implies that some people are unintellectual. Every single person has areas that they are and are not intelligent in. Classifying some individuals as intellectuals leaves out the remainder of society in a negative way. To correct this, the term “public intellectuals” should be replaced by a term that states an area of intellectualism.

When I searched for articles regarding service learning in my intended field of accounting, I found a rather interesting one. The author of this paper was assigned a project in which they had to act as a public intellectual and do service learning. The assignment ended up being greatly useful to the student. He was able to learn a great deal about accounting and experience his field in the real world, an experience he otherwise would have missed out on by simply reading a textbook. As stated in this article, http://www.newaccountantusa.com/newsFeat/wealthManagement/melanie_na_response_to_service-learning.pdf , service learning had made the student better educated, therefore making him more intellectual in his field. I would consider this student more of a public intellectual in the field of accounting.

I believe that anybody and everybody is a public intellectual in different ways. My intended field does offer opportunities to practice service learning and public intellectualism. Accounting has many potential research, teaching, and service opportunities, as well as all other fields in society.